<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 78 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18723</link>
    <description>The court allowed the banking company&#039;s claim for deductions on exchange losses during the assessment years 1973-74, 1974-75, and 1975-76. The Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal supported this decision, determining that the losses were due to exchange rate fluctuations and not devaluation, aligning with established legal precedents. The court held that the exchange loss was allowable as a deduction since the foreign currencies were considered stock-in-trade, ruling in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:01:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 78 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18723</link>
      <description>The court allowed the banking company&#039;s claim for deductions on exchange losses during the assessment years 1973-74, 1974-75, and 1975-76. The Commissioner (Appeals) and Tribunal supported this decision, determining that the losses were due to exchange rate fluctuations and not devaluation, aligning with established legal precedents. The court held that the exchange loss was allowable as a deduction since the foreign currencies were considered stock-in-trade, ruling in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>