<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18722</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, disallowing the deduction claimed for contribution to the approved gratuity fund under section 40A(7)(b)(i). The Court held that the amount claimed in the adjustment statement did not qualify as a provision and, therefore, was not deductible under the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:59:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18722</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, disallowing the deduction claimed for contribution to the approved gratuity fund under section 40A(7)(b)(i). The Court held that the amount claimed in the adjustment statement did not qualify as a provision and, therefore, was not deductible under the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>