<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 44 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382348</link>
    <description>The Authority ruled that the applicant must pay IGST on ocean freight under Reverse Charge Mechanism, as per Notifications 10/2017-IT(R) and 8/2017-IT(R), despite inclusion in CIF value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 44 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382348</link>
      <description>The Authority ruled that the applicant must pay IGST on ocean freight under Reverse Charge Mechanism, as per Notifications 10/2017-IT(R) and 8/2017-IT(R), despite inclusion in CIF value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>