<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 48 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18716</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving penalty provisions under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s refusal to refer questions of law to the High Court was justified as the findings were not challenged and the proposed questions were deemed academic. The Court agreed with the Tribunal on the validity of notices served to the assessee, noting procedural flaws and lack of reasonable opportunity. Ultimately, the High Court dismissed the reference applications, upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty, and rejected the applications with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 48 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18716</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving penalty provisions under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s refusal to refer questions of law to the High Court was justified as the findings were not challenged and the proposed questions were deemed academic. The Court agreed with the Tribunal on the validity of notices served to the assessee, noting procedural flaws and lack of reasonable opportunity. Ultimately, the High Court dismissed the reference applications, upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty, and rejected the applications with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>