<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 24 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing adjustments in the selection of comparable companies and depreciation claim while upholding the disallowance of repairs and maintenance expenses due to lack of supporting evidence. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with DRP&#039;s directions and considering industry-specific factors in selecting comparable companies for benchmarking international transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 07:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 24 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing adjustments in the selection of comparable companies and depreciation claim while upholding the disallowance of repairs and maintenance expenses due to lack of supporting evidence. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with DRP&#039;s directions and considering industry-specific factors in selecting comparable companies for benchmarking international transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>