<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 23 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382327</link>
    <description>The cross appeals by the assessee and Revenue regarding disallowance of bogus purchases for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 were adjudicated. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, emphasizing that disallowance should be based on a comparison of gross profit rates on genuine and hawala purchases rather than an ad-hoc basis. Both appeals by the assessee for the years 2010-11 and 2011-12 were allowed for statistical purposes, while the Revenue&#039;s cross appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 07:48:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 23 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382327</link>
      <description>The cross appeals by the assessee and Revenue regarding disallowance of bogus purchases for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12 were adjudicated. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, emphasizing that disallowance should be based on a comparison of gross profit rates on genuine and hawala purchases rather than an ad-hoc basis. Both appeals by the assessee for the years 2010-11 and 2011-12 were allowed for statistical purposes, while the Revenue&#039;s cross appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>