<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 42 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18715</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the loss claimed was not speculation loss but rather legitimate hedging transactions to guard against price fluctuations. The court emphasized the genuineness of the transactions and the intent to hedge as crucial factors. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was affirmed, allowing the assessee to claim the hedging loss under the Income-tax Act. All questions were answered in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:45:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 42 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18715</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the loss claimed was not speculation loss but rather legitimate hedging transactions to guard against price fluctuations. The court emphasized the genuineness of the transactions and the intent to hedge as crucial factors. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was affirmed, allowing the assessee to claim the hedging loss under the Income-tax Act. All questions were answered in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>