<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1554 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281679</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, deleting the enhancements made by the CIT(A) and the corresponding penalties. The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT(A) had exceeded his jurisdiction by introducing new sources of income not considered by the AO, and such actions should be dealt with under the appropriate sections of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 07:25:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1554 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281679</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, deleting the enhancements made by the CIT(A) and the corresponding penalties. The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT(A) had exceeded his jurisdiction by introducing new sources of income not considered by the AO, and such actions should be dealt with under the appropriate sections of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>