<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Limitation of time and Refund of Tax vs Deposit under Indirect tax Laws</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8575</link>
    <description>Erroneous payments made without legal authority under excise, customs, service tax or allied cesses lose the character of tax and are recoverable irrespective of the statutory one year refund window that applies to payments made under authority of law. Where retrospective exemption, contract frustration, or absence of liability removes legal sanction, the amount is treated as a deposit refundable provided no unjust enrichment exists. Recovery is nevertheless subject to equitable limitation principles, and a reasonable period (proposed three years) is suggested for claiming such refunds to balance taxpayer rights and administrative certainty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 07:22:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 07:22:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Limitation of time and Refund of Tax vs Deposit under Indirect tax Laws</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8575</link>
      <description>Erroneous payments made without legal authority under excise, customs, service tax or allied cesses lose the character of tax and are recoverable irrespective of the statutory one year refund window that applies to payments made under authority of law. Where retrospective exemption, contract frustration, or absence of liability removes legal sanction, the amount is treated as a deposit refundable provided no unjust enrichment exists. Recovery is nevertheless subject to equitable limitation principles, and a reasonable period (proposed three years) is suggested for claiming such refunds to balance taxpayer rights and administrative certainty.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2019 07:22:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>