<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1758 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281667</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of deduction under section 80 IB (10) of the Income Tax Act, holding that the deduction was allowable as the flats were allotted and registered before the relevant amendment. However, the appeal concerning the disallowance of depreciation on a new motor car was dismissed due to the appellant&#039;s failure to provide evidence supporting the claim. The judgment was delivered on 22nd March 2017 in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2019 22:05:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=577096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1758 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281667</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of deduction under section 80 IB (10) of the Income Tax Act, holding that the deduction was allowable as the flats were allotted and registered before the relevant amendment. However, the appeal concerning the disallowance of depreciation on a new motor car was dismissed due to the appellant&#039;s failure to provide evidence supporting the claim. The judgment was delivered on 22nd March 2017 in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>