<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 7 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18710</link>
    <description>Charitable institutions may treat legal expenses incurred to defend founders or office-bearers in criminal proceedings as application of income where the proceedings arise from institutional activities and the defence protects the institution&#039;s existence, reputation, and objects. Incidental personal benefit does not by itself establish prohibited benefit to specified persons. Belated registration, where delay is condoned, may operate from the trust&#039;s inception rather than only prospectively, supporting exemption for an earlier assessment year. The tax issues were resolved substantially in favour of the institution, while a separate portion of the legal-expense claim required fresh determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 7 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18710</link>
      <description>Charitable institutions may treat legal expenses incurred to defend founders or office-bearers in criminal proceedings as application of income where the proceedings arise from institutional activities and the defence protects the institution&#039;s existence, reputation, and objects. Incidental personal benefit does not by itself establish prohibited benefit to specified persons. Belated registration, where delay is condoned, may operate from the trust&#039;s inception rather than only prospectively, supporting exemption for an earlier assessment year. The tax issues were resolved substantially in favour of the institution, while a separate portion of the legal-expense claim required fresh determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>