https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382303 The court addressed the seizure of goods by GST officers due to non-production of E-Way Bill during transit. It interpreted Sections 129 and 130 of the GST Act, emphasizing due process before confiscation. The court determined the balance amount needed for releasing the seized goods, directing payment by the petitioner. Admissibility of interim relief was discussed, with goods to be released upon depositing a specified amount. An undertaking for cooperation in case of an unsuccessful petition was required from the writ-applicant. Further proceedings were scheduled for July 24, 2019. en-us Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Mar 2025 12:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382303 The court addressed the seizure of goods by GST officers due to non-production of E-Way Bill during transit. It interpreted Sections 129 and 130 of the GST Act, emphasizing due process before confiscation. The court determined the balance amount needed for releasing the seized goods, directing payment by the petitioner. Admissibility of interim relief was discussed, with goods to be released upon depositing a specified amount. An undertaking for cooperation in case of an unsuccessful petition was required from the writ-applicant. Further proceedings were scheduled for July 24, 2019. Case-Laws GST Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382303