<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1353 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382276</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition filed under Section 7 of the I&amp;amp;B Code against the Corporate Debtor, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). A moratorium was declared under Section 14 of the I&amp;amp;B Code, and Mr. Arunava Sikdar was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional. The Tribunal found in favor of the Petitioner, emphasizing the existence of debt and default as the primary concern.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2019 06:14:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1353 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382276</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition filed under Section 7 of the I&amp;amp;B Code against the Corporate Debtor, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). A moratorium was declared under Section 14 of the I&amp;amp;B Code, and Mr. Arunava Sikdar was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional. The Tribunal found in favor of the Petitioner, emphasizing the existence of debt and default as the primary concern.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>