<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1344 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281650</link>
    <description>The Gujarat High Court recorded substantial questions of law on whether the Tribunal was correct in applying the extended period of limitation, whether the finding of lack of reasonable care under rule 7(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was sustainable, and whether denial of cenvat credit with the related liabilities was valid. The tax appeal was admitted for consideration on those questions of law and was directed to be heard with connected appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2019 05:41:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1344 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281650</link>
      <description>The Gujarat High Court recorded substantial questions of law on whether the Tribunal was correct in applying the extended period of limitation, whether the finding of lack of reasonable care under rule 7(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was sustainable, and whether denial of cenvat credit with the related liabilities was valid. The tax appeal was admitted for consideration on those questions of law and was directed to be heard with connected appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>