https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281648 The petition seeking restoration of a company's name in the Register of Companies, which was struck off under Section 248 of the Companies Act 2013 for non-compliance with statutory filings, was denied. The court found that the company was not engaged in any business or operations as required by law, having failed to meet various statutory requirements and remaining inactive for a significant period. The Bench concluded that interfering with the Government/ROC's decision to strike off such companies, including the petitioner's, was not warranted, leading to the dismissal of the restoration plea. en-us Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Jun 2019 05:41:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281648 The petition seeking restoration of a company's name in the Register of Companies, which was struck off under Section 248 of the Companies Act 2013 for non-compliance with statutory filings, was denied. The court found that the company was not engaged in any business or operations as required by law, having failed to meet various statutory requirements and remaining inactive for a significant period. The Bench concluded that interfering with the Government/ROC's decision to strike off such companies, including the petitioner's, was not warranted, leading to the dismissal of the restoration plea. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281648