<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1749 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281640</link>
    <description>In a summons-case complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act, an accused should ordinarily raise jurisdictional and related objections before the trial court at the stage of notice under Section 251 CrPC, rather than seek quashing under Section 482 CrPC before that stage is reached. The High Court should not pre-empt the trial court&#039;s consideration of such objections, which ought to be decided by a speaking order in the first instance. The quashing petition was therefore not entertained on merits, and the petitioner was relegated to the trial court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 17:42:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1749 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281640</link>
      <description>In a summons-case complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act, an accused should ordinarily raise jurisdictional and related objections before the trial court at the stage of notice under Section 251 CrPC, rather than seek quashing under Section 482 CrPC before that stage is reached. The High Court should not pre-empt the trial court&#039;s consideration of such objections, which ought to be decided by a speaking order in the first instance. The quashing petition was therefore not entertained on merits, and the petitioner was relegated to the trial court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>