<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 45 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18694</link>
    <description>A tube-well installed for business use and employed to draw water needed for production and industrial labour falls within the wide meaning of &quot;plant&quot; under section 43(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to investment allowance on the cost of the tube-well. The stated ratio is that a tube-well used in business for production-related purposes qualifies as plant for income-tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:39:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 45 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18694</link>
      <description>A tube-well installed for business use and employed to draw water needed for production and industrial labour falls within the wide meaning of &quot;plant&quot; under section 43(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to investment allowance on the cost of the tube-well. The stated ratio is that a tube-well used in business for production-related purposes qualifies as plant for income-tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>