<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (6) TMI 6 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18693</link>
    <description>Money-lending receipts were treated as business income because the lending activity was characterised as a business and the relevant monies were regarded as stock-in-trade. On that footing, the amount forgone by the assessee was accepted as a deductible business loss. The Tribunal&#039;s approach was supported by an earlier ruling involving the assessee&#039;s son, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee against the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:37:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (6) TMI 6 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18693</link>
      <description>Money-lending receipts were treated as business income because the lending activity was characterised as a business and the relevant monies were regarded as stock-in-trade. On that footing, the amount forgone by the assessee was accepted as a deductible business loss. The Tribunal&#039;s approach was supported by an earlier ruling involving the assessee&#039;s son, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee against the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>