<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1297 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382220</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection, upholding the cancellation of the penalty due to the invalidity of the notice issued under section 271(1)(c). The tribunal emphasized the necessity for clear and specific penalty notices, in line with legal precedents, to ensure fairness and adherence to natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 07:09:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1297 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382220</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection, upholding the cancellation of the penalty due to the invalidity of the notice issued under section 271(1)(c). The tribunal emphasized the necessity for clear and specific penalty notices, in line with legal precedents, to ensure fairness and adherence to natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>