<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1292 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271G imposed by the AO for failure to maintain documentation as required under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided the necessary documentation, even though it did not meet the TPO&#039;s format requirements. The penalty was deemed unjustified as the assessee had submitted the required information, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal on 24/06/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1292 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271G imposed by the AO for failure to maintain documentation as required under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided the necessary documentation, even though it did not meet the TPO&#039;s format requirements. The penalty was deemed unjustified as the assessee had submitted the required information, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal on 24/06/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>