<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1291 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382214</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in ITA No.1611/Chd/2018, ITA No.1612/Chd/2018, and ITA No.1613/Chd/2018, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The CIT(A) correctly allowed deduction under Section 80P(2)(e) for rental income from warehouses and deleted the disallowance of interest and administrative expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Revenue failed to provide evidence to challenge the factual findings, leading to the dismissal of their appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 07:09:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1291 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382214</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in ITA No.1611/Chd/2018, ITA No.1612/Chd/2018, and ITA No.1613/Chd/2018, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The CIT(A) correctly allowed deduction under Section 80P(2)(e) for rental income from warehouses and deleted the disallowance of interest and administrative expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Revenue failed to provide evidence to challenge the factual findings, leading to the dismissal of their appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>