<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 69 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18684</link>
    <description>Expenditure on salary, transit accommodation and travelling costs connected with tea cultivation and manufacture was deductible only if it was non-capital and laid out wholly and exclusively for earning agricultural income, and only to the extent not already allowed in earlier computation. The taxing authorities had not recorded a definite finding on whether the claimed expenses satisfied that statutory test, and allowance under income-tax computation did not by itself determine the agricultural income-tax claim. On that basis, the disallowance was unsustainable, the assessment and revisional orders were set aside, and the matter was left open for fresh assessment in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:19:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 69 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18684</link>
      <description>Expenditure on salary, transit accommodation and travelling costs connected with tea cultivation and manufacture was deductible only if it was non-capital and laid out wholly and exclusively for earning agricultural income, and only to the extent not already allowed in earlier computation. The taxing authorities had not recorded a definite finding on whether the claimed expenses satisfied that statutory test, and allowance under income-tax computation did not by itself determine the agricultural income-tax claim. On that basis, the disallowance was unsustainable, the assessment and revisional orders were set aside, and the matter was left open for fresh assessment in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>