<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1286 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382209</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c). The decision was based on the absence of deliberate intent to furnish inaccurate particulars and the lack of immediate tax benefit to the assessee due to the loss in the return of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1286 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382209</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c). The decision was based on the absence of deliberate intent to furnish inaccurate particulars and the lack of immediate tax benefit to the assessee due to the loss in the return of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>