<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Penalty Imposed Under Wrong Provision Deemed Unsustainable Due to Lack of Specificity in AO&#039;s Standard Proforma Use.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47521</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO initiated penalty on one limb of section 271(1)(c) and had imposed penalty on another limb - Third Member has upheld the view of AM that the standard proforma without striking of the relevant clauses will lead to an inference as to non-application of mind by AO and penalty is not sustainable</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 07:08:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 07:08:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Penalty Imposed Under Wrong Provision Deemed Unsustainable Due to Lack of Specificity in AO&#039;s Standard Proforma Use.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47521</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO initiated penalty on one limb of section 271(1)(c) and had imposed penalty on another limb - Third Member has upheld the view of AM that the standard proforma without striking of the relevant clauses will lead to an inference as to non-application of mind by AO and penalty is not sustainable</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 07:08:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>