<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 18 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18682</link>
    <description>Section 43B did not require disallowance of sales tax liability where the amount was paid within the time permitted under the relevant sales tax law, so the deduction was allowed. The amended section 43B, effective from 1 April 1988, was also treated as retrospectively applicable to assessment year 1987-88, with the result that the assessee succeeded on both questions and the Tribunal&#039;s view was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 18 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18682</link>
      <description>Section 43B did not require disallowance of sales tax liability where the amount was paid within the time permitted under the relevant sales tax law, so the deduction was allowed. The amended section 43B, effective from 1 April 1988, was also treated as retrospectively applicable to assessment year 1987-88, with the result that the assessee succeeded on both questions and the Tribunal&#039;s view was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>