<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 499 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281614</link>
    <description>A suit seeking cancellation of a registered sale deed on allegations of fraud, misrepresentation and undue influence was considered, with the central question being whether the evidence in the excerpt was sufficient to rebut the presumption attached to a registered conveyance. The available text does not disclose the court&#039;s final determination on proof of those allegations or on whether the presumption in favour of the sale deed was displaced. No further outcome can be stated from the incomplete material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 15:29:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 499 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281614</link>
      <description>A suit seeking cancellation of a registered sale deed on allegations of fraud, misrepresentation and undue influence was considered, with the central question being whether the evidence in the excerpt was sufficient to rebut the presumption attached to a registered conveyance. The available text does not disclose the court&#039;s final determination on proof of those allegations or on whether the presumption in favour of the sale deed was displaced. No further outcome can be stated from the incomplete material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>