<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 68 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18680</link>
    <description>Agricultural land in India used for agricultural purposes is excluded from the definition of &quot;capital asset&quot; under section 2(14)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so capital gains tax does not arise on that basis. The court noted that the record showed agricultural use of the land and that agricultural income from it was undisputed. On those facts, the statutory exclusion applied, and the Revenue could not show any infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s view.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:05:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 68 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18680</link>
      <description>Agricultural land in India used for agricultural purposes is excluded from the definition of &quot;capital asset&quot; under section 2(14)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so capital gains tax does not arise on that basis. The court noted that the record showed agricultural use of the land and that agricultural income from it was undisputed. On those facts, the statutory exclusion applied, and the Revenue could not show any infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s view.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>