<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1257 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382180</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty notice was deemed invalid as it failed to specify the limb of the section for penalty initiation. Consequently, the penalty of &amp;amp;8377;29,93,984 was canceled, and the appeal succeeded based on this ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:39:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1257 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382180</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The penalty notice was deemed invalid as it failed to specify the limb of the section for penalty initiation. Consequently, the penalty of &amp;amp;8377;29,93,984 was canceled, and the appeal succeeded based on this ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>