<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1252 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382175</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to allow the weighted deduction under Section 35(2AB), delete the disallowance of R&amp;amp;D expenses allocated to the partnership firm, and remove the addition re-characterizing remuneration as royalty income. The decision was based on precedents and upheld the principle that expenses incurred for business purposes are allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1252 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382175</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to allow the weighted deduction under Section 35(2AB), delete the disallowance of R&amp;amp;D expenses allocated to the partnership firm, and remove the addition re-characterizing remuneration as royalty income. The decision was based on precedents and upheld the principle that expenses incurred for business purposes are allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>