<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1245 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382168</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the Commissioner (Appeals) order on penalty determination at 25% of service tax demand under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The court emphasized adherence to statutory timelines for paying reduced penalties, ruling that any extension beyond the specified period is legally unsustainable. The imposition of penalty was set aside in a related appeal, rendering the current appeal moot and leading to its dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:38:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1245 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382168</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the Commissioner (Appeals) order on penalty determination at 25% of service tax demand under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The court emphasized adherence to statutory timelines for paying reduced penalties, ruling that any extension beyond the specified period is legally unsustainable. The imposition of penalty was set aside in a related appeal, rendering the current appeal moot and leading to its dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>