<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1241 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382164</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the rejection of the stay application and granting a stay of recovery of the balance amount subject to the condition that the petitioner deposit an additional 25% of the demand within six weeks. The judges emphasized that imposing conditions on the petitioner would have been more appropriate than outright rejection. The ruling provided relief to the petitioner by ensuring the appeal process could proceed without undue financial burden.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:31:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1241 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382164</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the rejection of the stay application and granting a stay of recovery of the balance amount subject to the condition that the petitioner deposit an additional 25% of the demand within six weeks. The judges emphasized that imposing conditions on the petitioner would have been more appropriate than outright rejection. The ruling provided relief to the petitioner by ensuring the appeal process could proceed without undue financial burden.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>