<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1443 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281601</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part, directing the assessing officer to recognize the liability of Rs. 20,50,00,000 as crystallized due to an earlier lease termination. The Tribunal also instructed a review of claims for gratuity and leave encashment, referencing legal precedents and the need for verification. The addition of Rs. 6,00,00,000 for the lease termination was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:30:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1443 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281601</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part, directing the assessing officer to recognize the liability of Rs. 20,50,00,000 as crystallized due to an earlier lease termination. The Tribunal also instructed a review of claims for gratuity and leave encashment, referencing legal precedents and the need for verification. The addition of Rs. 6,00,00,000 for the lease termination was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>