https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281609 The High Court condoned a 10-day delay in re-filing the appeal, allowing it to proceed. The Court did not frame a question of law on treating expenditure on advertisements as revenue expenditure, finding no legal infirmity in the ITAT's order. Referring to a previous order, the Court ruled against the Revenue on the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A of the Act. Notice was issued for further examination of the transfer pricing adjustment, highlighting its significance for the appeal process. en-us Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:30:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281609 The High Court condoned a 10-day delay in re-filing the appeal, allowing it to proceed. The Court did not frame a question of law on treating expenditure on advertisements as revenue expenditure, finding no legal infirmity in the ITAT's order. Referring to a previous order, the Court ruled against the Revenue on the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A of the Act. Notice was issued for further examination of the transfer pricing adjustment, highlighting its significance for the appeal process. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281609