<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1653 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act due to procedural irregularities in the penalty notice. The decision was based on the non-specificity of the penalty initiation and legal precedents. The additional grounds raised by the assessee were admitted and considered, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:30:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1653 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act due to procedural irregularities in the penalty notice. The decision was based on the non-specificity of the penalty initiation and legal precedents. The additional grounds raised by the assessee were admitted and considered, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>