<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1239 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382162</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the services provided by the appellant under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; and confirmed the demand for service tax. However, it set aside the penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the appellant&#039;s prior payment of tax and interest and the absence of any deliberate intent to evade tax. The appeal was directed accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:30:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1239 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382162</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the services provided by the appellant under &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; and confirmed the demand for service tax. However, it set aside the penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the appellant&#039;s prior payment of tax and interest and the absence of any deliberate intent to evade tax. The appeal was directed accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>