https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382158 A writ petition challenging a GST penalty order was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the Act. The dispute turned on factual issues concerning the e-way bill and place of delivery, and the petitioner had already paid the penalty and secured release of the goods. In these circumstances, the Court directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy before the Appellate Authority. It further stated that if the appeal is filed within two weeks from receipt of a certified copy of the order, the Appellate Authority should consider it on merits without raising limitation objections. en-us Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382158 A writ petition challenging a GST penalty order was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the Act. The dispute turned on factual issues concerning the e-way bill and place of delivery, and the petitioner had already paid the penalty and secured release of the goods. In these circumstances, the Court directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy before the Appellate Authority. It further stated that if the appeal is filed within two weeks from receipt of a certified copy of the order, the Appellate Authority should consider it on merits without raising limitation objections. Case-Laws GST Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382158