<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1227 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382150</link>
    <description>An order permitting withdrawal of a tax appeal was recalled and the appeal restored because the tax effect exceeded the monetary limit in Circular No. 3 of 2018. The record showed that the earlier withdrawal resulted from an error by the applicant, and the withdrawal order had reserved liberty to revive the appeal if the discrepancy later came to light. On that basis, the court held that recall of the earlier order was warranted and the appeal was restored to file.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1227 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382150</link>
      <description>An order permitting withdrawal of a tax appeal was recalled and the appeal restored because the tax effect exceeded the monetary limit in Circular No. 3 of 2018. The record showed that the earlier withdrawal resulted from an error by the applicant, and the withdrawal order had reserved liberty to revive the appeal if the discrepancy later came to light. On that basis, the court held that recall of the earlier order was warranted and the appeal was restored to file.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>