<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 120 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18658</link>
    <description>Where the Agricultural Income-tax Act and Rules provide a distinct decision-making process for registration of a sub-partnership, the assessing authority must pass a separate written order on the registration application and communicate it to the applicant. Rule 4(2) requires a written refusal and copy to the applicant when registration is declined, and Rule 7 similarly contemplates a written order on rejection. The availability of a separate appeal against refusal of registration reinforces that registration and assessment are separate matters, even if both are dealt with in a composite assessment order. The answer is stated to be in the affirmative, favouring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:42:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 120 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18658</link>
      <description>Where the Agricultural Income-tax Act and Rules provide a distinct decision-making process for registration of a sub-partnership, the assessing authority must pass a separate written order on the registration application and communicate it to the applicant. Rule 4(2) requires a written refusal and copy to the applicant when registration is declined, and Rule 7 similarly contemplates a written order on rejection. The availability of a separate appeal against refusal of registration reinforces that registration and assessment are separate matters, even if both are dealt with in a composite assessment order. The answer is stated to be in the affirmative, favouring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>