<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 371 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281567</link>
    <description>The SC upheld a conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that the alleged delay in lodging the FIR was not inordinate where it was filed within about eight hours at a police station 10 miles away and reached the Magistrate the next morning. The testimony of the two eye-witnesses was found consistent against the appellant, and minor discrepancies were insufficient to discard their evidence. Recovery of the gandasi at the appellant&#039;s instance, with blood stains on the weapon and his turban, corroborated the ocular version. The witnesses&#039; relationship to the deceased and prior disputes did not discredit otherwise convincing evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:58:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 371 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281567</link>
      <description>The SC upheld a conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that the alleged delay in lodging the FIR was not inordinate where it was filed within about eight hours at a police station 10 miles away and reached the Magistrate the next morning. The testimony of the two eye-witnesses was found consistent against the appellant, and minor discrepancies were insufficient to discard their evidence. Recovery of the gandasi at the appellant&#039;s instance, with blood stains on the weapon and his turban, corroborated the ocular version. The witnesses&#039; relationship to the deceased and prior disputes did not discredit otherwise convincing evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>