<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1162 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382085</link>
    <description>Provisional release of seized imported goods under the Customs Act required fresh consideration because the rejection was made before the Supreme Court&#039;s later guidance on release on appropriate terms. The customs authority&#039;s decision was therefore set aside, and the request had to be reconsidered by the competent authority after giving the petitioner a hearing and passing a reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:07:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1162 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382085</link>
      <description>Provisional release of seized imported goods under the Customs Act required fresh consideration because the rejection was made before the Supreme Court&#039;s later guidance on release on appropriate terms. The customs authority&#039;s decision was therefore set aside, and the request had to be reconsidered by the competent authority after giving the petitioner a hearing and passing a reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>