https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382082 The Court acknowledged the petitioner's alternative remedy but decided to remand the matter for cross-examination of witnesses if an appeal is filed before CESTAT. The petitioner must comply with a pre-deposit requirement for the appeal to proceed. The Court kept all rights and contentions open, directing CESTAT to adjudicate on the appeal's merits after the remand. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, with the order to be issued under the Court Master's signatures. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:04:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382082 The Court acknowledged the petitioner's alternative remedy but decided to remand the matter for cross-examination of witnesses if an appeal is filed before CESTAT. The petitioner must comply with a pre-deposit requirement for the appeal to proceed. The Court kept all rights and contentions open, directing CESTAT to adjudicate on the appeal's merits after the remand. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, with the order to be issued under the Court Master's signatures. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382082