<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1158 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382081</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order for the absolute confiscation of electronic components and wrist watch hands under the Customs Act, 1962, without offering the option to redeem. It was found that the appellant was not properly notified of the address change, and the denial of redemption was deemed improper. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, with instructions to provide proper notice to the importer and adhere to the Customs Act provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:04:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1158 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382081</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order for the absolute confiscation of electronic components and wrist watch hands under the Customs Act, 1962, without offering the option to redeem. It was found that the appellant was not properly notified of the address change, and the denial of redemption was deemed improper. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, with instructions to provide proper notice to the importer and adhere to the Customs Act provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>