<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1156 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382079</link>
    <description>Imported goods that operated as a vacuum cleaner and were equipped with an electric motor were found not to fit the customs classification adopted by the authorities under Heading 8508 6000. The acceptance of later consignments on the declared classification, without objection, also supported the importer&#039;s position. On that basis, the declared heading under Heading 8479 8999 was accepted and the customs classification proposed by the authorities was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:03:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1156 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382079</link>
      <description>Imported goods that operated as a vacuum cleaner and were equipped with an electric motor were found not to fit the customs classification adopted by the authorities under Heading 8508 6000. The acceptance of later consignments on the declared classification, without objection, also supported the importer&#039;s position. On that basis, the declared heading under Heading 8479 8999 was accepted and the customs classification proposed by the authorities was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>