<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1151 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Provisional Attachment Order against the appellant, ruling that the CEO of the Wakf Board was not involved in money laundering. The bank and its employees were held responsible for the fraudulent transaction, emphasizing the importance of complying with RBI guidelines. The Tribunal found no evidence linking the CEO to the proceeds of crime and emphasized the burden of proof on the Respondent Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1151 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Provisional Attachment Order against the appellant, ruling that the CEO of the Wakf Board was not involved in money laundering. The bank and its employees were held responsible for the fraudulent transaction, emphasizing the importance of complying with RBI guidelines. The Tribunal found no evidence linking the CEO to the proceeds of crime and emphasized the burden of proof on the Respondent Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>