https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382068 The Court allowed the appeal and condoned the delay of 102 days in filing the appeal challenging the order-in-appeal. It held that valid communication of the order-in-appeal occurred when served at the appellant's office address, even without personal service on the Trustee. The Court considered the charitable nature of the Trust and the explanation provided for the delay, concluding that the delay warranted condonation in the interest of justice. The Court answered the substantial question of law in favor of the appellant, directing the parties to appear before the Tribunal for the appeal's disposal on merits, with no costs awarded. en-us Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 08:13:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382068 The Court allowed the appeal and condoned the delay of 102 days in filing the appeal challenging the order-in-appeal. It held that valid communication of the order-in-appeal occurred when served at the appellant's office address, even without personal service on the Trustee. The Court considered the charitable nature of the Trust and the explanation provided for the delay, concluding that the delay warranted condonation in the interest of justice. The Court answered the substantial question of law in favor of the appellant, directing the parties to appear before the Tribunal for the appeal's disposal on merits, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382068