https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382060 The Court upheld the challenged assessment orders related to CST and TIN for the year 2016-17, emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking judicial intervention. The petitioner's arguments regarding the rate of tax for UPS, revision of Form WW, and lack of opportunity for a personal hearing were not accepted, with the Court directing the petitioner to pursue an appeal to the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Chennai (South) for further review. The impugned orders were maintained, with the Court leaving all merits open for the Appellate Authority's consideration, particularly focusing on the corrigendum to Form WW supported by relevant documents. en-us Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:55:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382060 The Court upheld the challenged assessment orders related to CST and TIN for the year 2016-17, emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking judicial intervention. The petitioner's arguments regarding the rate of tax for UPS, revision of Form WW, and lack of opportunity for a personal hearing were not accepted, with the Court directing the petitioner to pursue an appeal to the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Chennai (South) for further review. The impugned orders were maintained, with the Court leaving all merits open for the Appellate Authority's consideration, particularly focusing on the corrigendum to Form WW supported by relevant documents. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382060