<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1132 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382055</link>
    <description>For classification as an Ayurvedic medicine under the Uttarakhand VAT Act, the decisive test was whether the product&#039;s ingredients were shown to be covered by authoritative Ayurvedic texts in the First Schedule to the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. An Ayurvedic drug licence was relevant but not conclusive, and the quantity of active ingredients or sale without prescription was not determinative. The Tribunal had not properly examined the assessee&#039;s claim of acceptance in other States or the absence of evidence linking the product to authoritative texts, so the classification could not be finalised on the existing record and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1132 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382055</link>
      <description>For classification as an Ayurvedic medicine under the Uttarakhand VAT Act, the decisive test was whether the product&#039;s ingredients were shown to be covered by authoritative Ayurvedic texts in the First Schedule to the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. An Ayurvedic drug licence was relevant but not conclusive, and the quantity of active ingredients or sale without prescription was not determinative. The Tribunal had not properly examined the assessee&#039;s claim of acceptance in other States or the absence of evidence linking the product to authoritative texts, so the classification could not be finalised on the existing record and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>