<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1129 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382052</link>
    <description>Disciplinary proceedings should ordinarily be permitted to continue, and a charge-sheet will not be quashed merely because some delay has occurred. Interference is justified only where the delay is abnormal, unexplained, and shown to have caused prejudice, having regard to the nature and complexity of the allegations and the reasons for the delay. A charge memorandum is also not invalid merely because its language is strongly worded; it must be read as a whole, and it does not amount to a final finding of guilt unless it is wholly without jurisdiction or patently illegal. In the matter discussed, the delay was explained and the memorandum was treated as setting out imputations for enquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 07:45:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1129 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382052</link>
      <description>Disciplinary proceedings should ordinarily be permitted to continue, and a charge-sheet will not be quashed merely because some delay has occurred. Interference is justified only where the delay is abnormal, unexplained, and shown to have caused prejudice, having regard to the nature and complexity of the allegations and the reasons for the delay. A charge memorandum is also not invalid merely because its language is strongly worded; it must be read as a whole, and it does not amount to a final finding of guilt unless it is wholly without jurisdiction or patently illegal. In the matter discussed, the delay was explained and the memorandum was treated as setting out imputations for enquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>