<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1121 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382044</link>
    <description>The ITAT confirmed the penalty under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act on surrendered undisclosed income, considering stock discrepancies as undisclosed income. The penalty of Rs. 28,30,000 was upheld based on the definition of undisclosed income and conditions specified in the Act, rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument that the surrendered income was disclosed in the return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 08:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1121 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382044</link>
      <description>The ITAT confirmed the penalty under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act on surrendered undisclosed income, considering stock discrepancies as undisclosed income. The penalty of Rs. 28,30,000 was upheld based on the definition of undisclosed income and conditions specified in the Act, rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument that the surrendered income was disclosed in the return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>