<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1118 - ITAT GUWAHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382041</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the defective show-cause notice, which did not specify the charge against the assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, rendered the penalty invalid. Relying on decisions from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, the tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Consequently, the penalties were deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1118 - ITAT GUWAHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382041</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the defective show-cause notice, which did not specify the charge against the assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, rendered the penalty invalid. Relying on decisions from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, the tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Consequently, the penalties were deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>